Comments for Sharecentric http://www.sharecentric.com/blog What Does It Mean? Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:21:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 Comment on Windows Vista 64 Bit Downgrade to 32 Bit Woes by Lanza http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-12768 Lanza Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:58:17 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-12768 People should read this. People should read this.

]]> Comment on Sample Poker Hand by hentai jjanggu shemale http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2005/12/31/sample-poker-hand/#comment-11162 hentai jjanggu shemale Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:05:51 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2005/12/31/sample-poker-hand/#comment-11162 hentai jjanggu hardcore http://rollyo.com/hentai-jjanggu hentai jjanggu hardcore http://rollyo.com/hentai-jjanggu

]]> Comment on Windows Vista 64 Bit Downgrade to 32 Bit Woes by themusicman http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-9539 themusicman Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:31:09 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-9539 I thought Bill Gates Started Apple? I thought Bill Gates Started Apple?

]]> Comment on Frodo in HBO: Rome by StranGe http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2005/09/19/frodo-in-hbo-rome/#comment-4664 StranGe Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:15:09 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2005/09/19/frodo-in-hbo-rome/#comment-4664 Kerry Condon rules !!!!!!!! Kerry Condon rules !!!!!!!!

]]> Comment on Windows Vista 64 Bit Downgrade to 32 Bit Woes by Mike http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-4176 Mike Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:33:30 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-4176 To Adam, As far as I know, there isn't a way to dual install in both x86 and x64. It has something to do with the way the two different processing bases load that once started, the system would have to shut down to switch, and in shutting down, it would bring your right back to select (again!) I'm a student at Penn State and I figured top of the line with 64-bit would be a good choice, well adapted for the future. Unfortunately, it seems my spaceship doesn't fit in the standard mini-van parking spots! I can't use the wireless VPN (64-bit not supported!), I can't use the printing services on-campus (64-bit not supported!), and I can't use the MIDI software for my recording software (guess what...64-bit not supported!) So all in all, if you're deciding between 32 and 64 bit systems, for the time being, you're probably best off with the good old x86. AMD might be stepping up to the reigning champion, but Intel-based will ALWAYS be the norm. To Adam,
As far as I know, there isn’t a way to dual install in both x86 and x64. It has something to do with the way the two different processing bases load that once started, the system would have to shut down to switch, and in shutting down, it would bring your right back to select (again!)
I’m a student at Penn State and I figured top of the line with 64-bit would be a good choice, well adapted for the future. Unfortunately, it seems my spaceship doesn’t fit in the standard mini-van parking spots! I can’t use the wireless VPN (64-bit not supported!), I can’t use the printing services on-campus (64-bit not supported!), and I can’t use the MIDI software for my recording software (guess what…64-bit not supported!)
So all in all, if you’re deciding between 32 and 64 bit systems, for the time being, you’re probably best off with the good old x86.
AMD might be stepping up to the reigning champion, but Intel-based will ALWAYS be the norm.

]]> Comment on Solutions for CD and DVD Media Storage by Matt http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/07/19/solutions-for-cd-and-dvd-media-storage/#comment-3645 Matt Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:58:34 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/07/19/solutions-for-cd-and-dvd-media-storage/#comment-3645 Test Ajax Comments Test Ajax Comments

]]> Comment on Windows Vista 64 Bit Downgrade to 32 Bit Woes by Adam http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-3123 Adam Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:42:46 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-3123 Hi is there a way i can have the best of both worlds and install both 32 and 64 bit? I'm not that good with installing OS'. I tried to dual boot XP with vista last time and it went horribly wrong, i didnt create a partion and i couldnt get back to vista so i had to lose all my data and reintall vista. So i was wandering how i go about doing this properly. while being able to keep the files i have on vista 64 as well? thanks Hi is there a way i can have the best of both worlds and install both 32 and 64 bit? I’m not that good with installing OS’. I tried to dual boot XP with vista last time and it went horribly wrong, i didnt create a partion and i couldnt get back to vista so i had to lose all my data and reintall vista. So i was wandering how i go about doing this properly. while being able to keep the files i have on vista 64 as well?

thanks

]]> Comment on Windows Vista 64 Bit Downgrade to 32 Bit Woes by aaron http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-2705 aaron Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:12:46 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2007/06/07/windows-vista-64-bit-downgrade-to-32-bit-woes/#comment-2705 pirates - 99999999999999999 microsoft - 0 no matter what microsoft pulls off, no matter what any company pulls off, there is always and i mean always a work around. But maybe if they never made such a ridiculously buggy and incompatible operating system a absolutely appauling cost. Maybe people wouldn't need to do pirating. After all, if people never used pirated versions of windows, imagine how much money they wouldve spent on microsoft by now and they still wouldnt be satisfied, and probably never will be. I know i am not satisfied, in fact i completely despise microsoft windows full-stop, every single version has been a failure, why rather than fooling around with upgrades, cant they just get it right first time. Surely they can get it right, considering bill gates brain is the "most expensive thing on the earth" pretty soon people will lose faith in windows and move onto macintosh, i am already planning on getting a macintosh. Im sick of windows fucking me around, and linux isnt exactly very user friendly and i dont have the time to learn it i have more important goals in life. Thing is though, linux is better than windows and it is free it doesnt cost anything and i guarantee if macintosh were made for pc's it would be free aswell, in fact i hear they have designed a mac os x for x86 computers, but i havent bothered with it yet coz i doubt it would work well or possibly not even detect the hardware in my computer, Maybe when i get an external hard drive i will test it out. But until then, the whole point of this post is.. MICROSOFT IS THE MOST UNRELIABLE COMPANY IN THIS WORLD, THEY PROVIDE SERVICES FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS YES BUT THEY ARE ONLY PROVIDING SERVICES FOR THE FUCK UPS THEY MADE IN THE FIRST PLACE, AND THE OPERATING SYSTEM IS HIGHLY OVERPRICED CONSIDERING MY BROTHER MAKES HIS OWN OPERATING SYSTEMS FOR LINUX WITH EASE AND THEY ARE A LOT BETTER THAN WINDOWS AND CAN EVEN RUN WINDOWS PROGRAMS WITH A WINDOWS EMULATOR CALLED WINE AND IT EVEN RUNS GAMES FAST TOO!!!! I advise anyone reading this, who does not agree with me to look it up on google, u'll probably find millions of posts saying windows sucks and mac os or linux os are well better. Linux has never ever crashed, never gotten a bug, never pissed me off, never set me back like £120, and never let me down whenever i have used it whereas windows constantly pisses me off every time i use it and whoever says, ur wrong microsoft rules blah blah blah, u r all noobs dont know what you are talking about, and are foolish because your only going to smash up ur computer one day in frustration because of windows lol wont even be the machines fault, inabit!! pirates - 99999999999999999
microsoft - 0

no matter what microsoft pulls off, no matter what any company pulls off, there is always and i mean always a work around. But maybe if they never made such a ridiculously buggy and incompatible operating system a absolutely appauling cost. Maybe people wouldn’t need to do pirating. After all, if people never used pirated versions of windows, imagine how much money they wouldve spent on microsoft by now and they still wouldnt be satisfied, and probably never will be. I know i am not satisfied, in fact i completely despise microsoft windows full-stop, every single version has been a failure, why rather than fooling around with upgrades, cant they just get it right first time. Surely they can get it right, considering bill gates brain is the “most expensive thing on the earth” pretty soon people will lose faith in windows and move onto macintosh, i am already planning on getting a macintosh. Im sick of windows fucking me around, and linux isnt exactly very user friendly and i dont have the time to learn it i have more important goals in life. Thing is though, linux is better than windows and it is free it doesnt cost anything and i guarantee if macintosh were made for pc’s it would be free aswell, in fact i hear they have designed a mac os x for x86 computers, but i havent bothered with it yet coz i doubt it would work well or possibly not even detect the hardware in my computer, Maybe when i get an external hard drive i will test it out. But until then, the whole point of this post is..

MICROSOFT IS THE MOST UNRELIABLE COMPANY IN THIS WORLD, THEY PROVIDE SERVICES FOR THEIR CUSTOMERS YES BUT THEY ARE ONLY PROVIDING SERVICES FOR THE FUCK UPS THEY MADE IN THE FIRST PLACE, AND THE OPERATING SYSTEM IS HIGHLY OVERPRICED CONSIDERING MY BROTHER MAKES HIS OWN OPERATING SYSTEMS FOR LINUX WITH EASE AND THEY ARE A LOT BETTER THAN WINDOWS AND CAN EVEN RUN WINDOWS PROGRAMS WITH A WINDOWS EMULATOR CALLED WINE AND IT EVEN RUNS GAMES FAST TOO!!!!

I advise anyone reading this, who does not agree with me to look it up on google, u’ll probably find millions of posts saying windows sucks and mac os or linux os are well better. Linux has never ever crashed, never gotten a bug, never pissed me off, never set me back like £120, and never let me down whenever i have used it whereas windows constantly pisses me off every time i use it and whoever says, ur wrong microsoft rules blah blah blah, u r all noobs dont know what you are talking about, and are foolish because your only going to smash up ur computer one day in frustration because of windows lol wont even be the machines fault, inabit!!

]]> Comment on Kobe Bryant Vindictive Bastard by Matt http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2006/05/06/kobe-bryant-vindictive-bastard/#comment-2680 Matt Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:01:53 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2006/05/06/kobe-bryant-vindictive-bastard/#comment-2680 Yes he is. Yes he is.

]]> Comment on Escaping Codec Hell by Rocko http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2006/04/06/escaping-codec-hell/#comment-2384 Rocko Sun, 20 May 2007 14:22:49 +0000 http://www.sharecentric.com/blog/2006/04/06/escaping-codec-hell/#comment-2384 Xvid? What a surprise. What do you expect from open source? Xvid? What a surprise.
What do you expect from open source?

]]>